I
will begin this article by stating forthrightly that I am a “conspiracy
theorist” in the normative sense of the term. That is, I am someone who
supposes that conspiratorial activity takes place between people of
means and power in a way that is not a matter of public record. I
contend that this is the default position of sanity and I assert that
those who have a particular problem with the assertion I just made are
what might be colloquially called “idiots”.
Taking
my cue from 9/11 and the egregious violations of common sense that
attended that event, I have come to see the “fourth estate” in North
America as non-existent. In its place is, I contend, a sophisticated
propaganda apparatus that supports the varied agendas of our plutocratic
rulers, whose vested interest in endless war is furthered via the
manifactured consent of the masses through strict narrative control.
I
contend that most of the civilian mass shootings and killings in recent
history in the Western democracies have been the result of a social
engineering program(s) by various intelligence agencies in support of
specific agendas. I have suspected this for a while. What really caught
my attention was Sandy Hook, and it is that event which I wish to
examine in detail in the remainder of this article. I realize it is past
history, but in recent days there has been a disturbing sign that soon
“conspiracy theorists” are going to be labeled as domestic terrorists
just for entertaining such thoughts, so I thought I would lay out the
case for Sandy Hook being fishy while it is still legal to do so.
Let
me begin, then, by emphasizing that I don’t know what transpired at
Sandy Hook. I wasn’t there, I wasn’t involved. What I do know is that
the “official” narrative surrounding Sandy Hook as presented by various
media sources was flawed and questionable. I am willing to have my mind
changed about this, but to change my mind, someone would have to address
the following points to my satisfaction. Much of the following text was
borrowed from an article written by James Tracey which I can no longer
find online.
1.> Details omitted. The New York Times,
the “official historians” of the United States, concluded its final
report on Sandy Hook with an article that did not include the names,
ages, or gender of the alleged victims of the shooting. The only time in
the history of crime reporting that such information has been omitted
has been in the case of sex crimes.
2.>
Twenty-eight people allegedly died: 27 children and adults, including
Adam Lanza, at the school, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, in her home at
36 Yogananda Street, Newtown. However, there is no direct proof of their
death: no photographic evidence or video footage was released to
confirm the official story that these 28 persons actually died. In fact,
no video surveillance footage shows anything — not even Adam shooting
out the front plate-glass window or walking through the halls like
Rambo, even though this is a school that had updated its security system
at the start of the 2012–13 academic year.
Compounding
the situation, the parents were not even allowed to view their
children’s bodies to identify them. Instead, they were reportedly shown
photographs of the deceased. This was done, according to the Medical
Examiner, Wayne Carver, in order to “control the situation.” But what
was there about the situation that required “control”? No parent of our
acquaintance would have agreed to accept the death of a child without
viewing the body. James Tracy has published a discussion of the medical examiner’s performance. According to Carver:
Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh — it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh —
Remarkably,
the state has done its best to avoid releasing the death certificates
and even recordings of the 911 calls. Death certificates were eventually
“released” but not to the public or those who might want to investigate
the case further, where only a short, general summary was available.
According to The New York Times,
in relation to the 911 calls, “no children are identified by name, no
callers indicate that they can see a child being shot, and the only
injury described is that of an educator’s being shot in the foot.”
Moreover,
the funerals were all “closed casket,” with one exception — that of
Noah Pozner, which supposedly included a private viewing before the
public ceremony.. As recounted in interviews with the families, the
circumstances of their last encounters with their children (or with
their caskets) are strange to say the least.
3.>
There is no evidence of any frantic effort to save lives or to remove
bodies to hospitals; instead the scene outside the school looked calm
and largely bloodless — with police and other personnel milling around
casually and a severe shortage of dead or injured victims.
In
a Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) like Sandy Hook, the proper protocol is
START triage (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) using tarps of
different colors with the aim being to save lives and get the injured to
the hospital for treatment. Not even the black tarps for the dead were
used, much less the red ones for those who needed immediate treatment.
Sandy
Hook Fire Chief Bill Halstead was ready to help the victims but could
recall only two wounded people. A few survivors were reportedly taken to
the hospital, but, oddly, these people were never interviewed. There
were no first-hand accounts that proved anyone was killed or injured.
Nonetheless, according to Lt. Vance, 18 children were pronounced dead at
the scene, two children were removed to “an area hospital” and were
pronounced dead at the hospital, and seven adults were pronounced dead
at the scene, including the shooter (NBC).
No
emergency vehicles were present at the school or even lined up in the
fire lane for a rescue attempt — the parking lot was filled with parked
cars, police cars and possibly media vehicles. Such rescue activity as
occurred was centered, not on the school premises, but at the nearby
Firehouse. Emergency vehicles at the Firehouse were jammed together
impeding access to the school, in case anyone might have thought about
attempting a rescue. The scene at the Firehouse was quite peculiar, with
people milling around and circling through the building, walking out
one door and into another.
4.>
According to initial reports in the media, weapons used in the shooting
included four handguns recovered at the scene, the only guns taken into
the school (NBC). Then an AR-15 was said to have been found in the
trunk of Lanza’s car (NBC). Then it was reported that Lanza may have
carried only two handguns and that a rifle was also found in the school
(NBC).
Wayne
Carver, the Medical Examiner, said that all the victims were shot with
the “long weapon.” Lt. Paul Vance then said that a Bushmaster AR-15
assault weapon with high capacity magazines was used “most of the time”
and that Lanza was carrying “many high-capacity clips” for the weapon
(Huffington Post).
In
January 2013, Connecticut state police released a statement indicating
that they had found four guns inside the school: a Bushmaster .223
caliber XM 15-E2S semi-automatic rifle with high capacity 30 round
clips, a Glock 10-mm handgun and a Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun. They said
they also found an Izhmash Canta-12 12-gauge shotgun in Lanza’s car
(NBC).
Lt. Vance then asserted that Lanza had killed all his victims with the .223-caliber semi-automatic rifle (ctpost.com).
Regarding the confusion, Vance told reporters, “It’s all these
conspiracy theorists that are trying to mucky up the waters.” Perhaps
“The Top Prize for Fantastical Reporting” goes to Fox News, however,
which announced that a 12-gauge shotgun along with two magazines
containing 70 rounds of Winchester 12-gauge shotgun rounds had been
found in the glove compartment of Adam Lanza’s Honda Civic — that’s right, in the glove compartment.
5.>
Adam Lanza can’t have carried out the shooting. Adam Lanza, reportedly a
frail young man weighing 120 pounds with Asperger’s Syndrome, is said
to have carried massive weaponry on his person when he shot his way into
the Sandy Hook school and proceeded to kill 26 people and then himself.
This after he supposedly killed his mother before driving to the
school.
According
to State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky, Lanza killed his 26 victims with
the Bushmaster .223-caliber rifle and then killed himself with his Glock
10-mm handgun. Lanza was also supposedly carrying three 30-round
magazines for the Bushmaster as well as a Sig-Sauer 9 mm handgun (see
above). The victims were shot multiple times each in a fusillade of
bullets from these military-style weapons. In order to wreak this havoc,
he fired more than 150 rounds, and he must have carried more rounds in
addition. Lanza was reportedly found dead wearing a bulletproof vest and
military-style clothing (AP).
As
Mike Powers, a professional military investigator and ballistics
expert, has observed, this young man of slight build could not have
carried all these heavy, bulky weapons and ammunition on his person.
Furthermore, since first responders were supposedly inside the school
within seven minutes, there was not enough time for Lanza to have
carried out the shooting as reported. In an interview with Joyce Riley,
Powers states that Lanza could not have fired so many times continuously
without destabilizing himself from the intense noise from the
Bushmaster. As a novice, he could not have shot an AR-15 with such speed
and accuracy, supposedly changing magazines 8–10 times without a
stoppage.
According
to Lt. Vance on the night of the shooting, one victim survived. So in
less than seven minutes — or less than five minutes according to the
media — Lanza killed 26 people and then himself, producing only one
injured victim. This is a 96% kill ratio, which is unheard-of accuracy
among the most experienced marksmen. Powers thinks the whole scenario is
a physical impossibility. He is not even convinced that Adam Lanza was a
real person. The story of the shooting should not be taken seriously.
The final travesty involves the weapons and other paraphernalia that were allegedly found in the Lanza house.
The “arsenal” supposedly included guns, Samurai swords, knives, a
bayonet and more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition, according to search
warrants released. Other items of interest were ear and eye protection,
binoculars, holsters, manuals, paper targets, a military-style uniform
and Lanza’s NRA certificate (Fox). Lanza had reportedly compiled a
spreadsheet 7 feet long and 4 feet wide in 9-point type detailing 500
victims of other mass murders (CBS). We are supposed to believe this,
and, at the same time, that Adam Lanza was a shy, quiet kid who didn’t
like noise and chaos, as promoted by the PBS Frontline Special,“Raising Adam Lanza.”
6.>
A man dressed in black was seen fleeing into the woods from the site of
the incident. Police chased him, apprehended him, and put him in
handcuffs in the back of their squad car. Video of this is readily
available on Youtube for the time being. Seem plausible to you that none
of the news networks had any interest in covering this angle of the
story?
7.>
Key participants displayed bizarre behaviour. There are many bizarre
media reports and interviews of those associated with the “shooting.”
Some examples:
Wayne Carver — Medical
Examiner Wayne Carver’s surreal press conference is one of the most
startling of all the media offerings. Widely available on youtube, this
event shows H. Wayne Carver II, a public official of some standing,
clowning and acting outlandish — grinning strangely, making irrelevant
comments, and basically appearing unknowledgeable and unprofessional.
Robbie Parker — Perhaps
the most famous press conference is that of Robbie Parker, the alleged
father of victim Emilie Parker, speaking on a CNN report of December 15,
2012. He chuckles as he walks up to the camera, then gets into
character by hyperventilating, and finally feigns distress as he talks
about his daughter — and about the fund set up to help raise money “for
Emilie.”
The families — In
addition to Robbie and Alissa Parker, other parents and family members
take their turn in the spotlight, including (but not limited to) Mark
and Jackie Barden, Jimmy Greene and Nelba Marquez-Greene, Ian and Nicole
Hockley, Neil Heslin (alleged father of Jesse Lewis), Chris and Lynn
McDonnell, Veronique Pozner, Carlee Soto, and David and Francine
Wheeler. Anderson Cooper is the interviewer in two notable instances:
his conversation with the McDonnells mentioned above, and an interview
with Veronique Pozner, remarkable for its green-screen effects such as
Anderson’s disappearing nose.
The school nurse — Numerous
reports offer detailed and totally fictitious information, some of
which was later abandoned in favor of more tenable versions. On the
evening of December 14, a USA Today reporter said she had spoken with
the school nurse, whom she had met on the street. The nurse told her
that the gunman had come into her office, “they met eyes, she jumped
under her desk,” and he walked out. The nurse said that the gunman was
the son of the kindergarten teacher, who was known to her and “an
absolutely loving person.” It later developed that Nancy Lanza had not
been a kindergarten teacher at all, and that neither Nancy nor Adam had
any connection to Sandy Hook school whatsoever.
Dawn Hochsprung — In an embarrassing fiction, The Newtown Bee
reported on 14 December 2013 that Dawn Hochsprung, the Sandy Hook
school principal, told the paper that a masked man had entered the
school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots — more than she
could count — that went “on and on.” Of course, Dawn Hochsprung was
allegedly killed by Adam Lanza and so could not easily have provided
this statement. In fact, Dawn was said to have acted heroically, dying
while lunging at the gunman — although one wonders who witnessed and
reported this act of heroism. On 17 December 2013, The Bee retracted the report and apologized:
An early online report from the scene at the December 14 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School quoted a woman who identified herself to our reporter as the principal of the school. The woman was not the school’s principal, Dawn Hochsprung, who was killed in the Friday morning attack. The quote was removed from subsequent online versions of the story, but the original story did remain in our online archive for three days before being deleted. We apologize for whatever confusion this may have caused our readers and for any pain or anguish it may have caused the Hochsprung family.
Now,
let’s be clear. None of this is proof that “nobody died at Sandy Hook”
or that “crisis actors” were involved in creating a dramatic spectacle. I
am not a fan of trying to figure out what did actually happen in these
cases, because theories can be tenuous and become low-hanging fruit for
people to debunk or make straw men out of. All I know is what didn’t
happen at Sandy Hook, and I know Adam Lanza didn’t single-handedly
murder multiple children in the way we were led to believe. The evidence
to say otherwise doesn’t exist.
I’m
not sure any of this will matter to those who are determined to ignore
it because of cognitive dissonance or whatever, but I thought it was
worth the effort to preserve some of this information for those who in
the coming days need to know the history of what appears to be an
ongoing effort to engineer consent for an enhanced police state.
Two
things stick in my mind about the Sandy Hook ordeal more than anything
else. One was the photo of Adam Lanza that was circulated… his eyes
vacant, his face expressionless, his cheeks hollow and sunken… due to a
very very obvious photoshopping of his likeness. The other thing that
sticks in my mind was Barack Obama breaking down in tears while
discussing the event, and again four years later… a career politician, a
hard-nosed pragmatist, bomber of 8 countries, surely no stranger to
political theatre. One might well imagine his teleprompter at the time
read: “weep here”. I don’t know much, but I know when someone is trying
to manipulate my feelings and jerk me around. I’ve worked in sales
enough to be that cynical.
I can only conclude that we’ve been conditioned to be duped and that
we’re being not-so-subtly played by people even more cynical than I am.
Perhaps it takes a cynic to see the handiwork of others, I donno.
Anyways, from the looks of things, the other shoe is about to drop.
Perhaps it’s best that it does… it seems like those who aren’t already
awake to this kind of thing have made a choice to stay asleep. I’m not
sure it’s my place to tell them that’s a bad idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment